People cannot find the site
Check the exact URL and query, intended indexing settings and available Search Console evidence. Separate indexing from ranking and Maps visibility before recommending content changes.
Whole-website audit & implementation
Website audits.
Fix what matters.
The $750 Audit & Fix Sprint combines a review of 22 website areas with up to two agreed small fixes on an eligible supported website.
From a symptom to evidence
Find the reason
before choosing the fix.
A small business website audit starts with the task that is failing. An SEO audit may reveal an indexing or page-content problem. A usability review may show that people cannot find the right service or complete a form. A performance check may identify an oversized resource. Those findings lead to different next steps.
Visitors do not inquire
Review the offer, service boundaries, evidence, navigation and contact path. Traffic alone does not prove the right audience arrived. A conversion-focused review identifies friction; it cannot promise more inquiries.
The site is slow or hard to use
Inspect representative pages on mobile and desktop, including keyboard use and the main visitor task. Lab performance results are diagnostic evidence, not a claim about every visitor’s experience or an accessibility certification.
Use the website audit checklist to record the symptom, evidence, affected page and completion check. The Sprint’s up-to-two contained fixes follow a feasibility review; a large rebuild or unsupported system does not become a small fix because it appeared in an audit.
Choose the right starting point.
Get ready for ongoing care
Website Baseline
$399 fixed fee · USD
Access inventory, a review of 22 areas and an ordered list of work.
A first contained safe fix where appropriate; no fix is promised before review.
First payment after approval: $399 covers the full studio fee.
Full scope and payment termsFinish a small set of repairs
Audit & Fix Sprint
$750 fixed fee · USD
The same review, plus up to two agreed small fixes on a supported site—for example, correcting a broken form link.
One combined feedback round, retesting and before/after notes.
First payment after approval: $375.
Full scope and payment termsProvider bills, tax and approved additions are separate. Fit, supported tools and dates are confirmed before payment.
Before booking, confirm supported technology, access, approved facts and worthwhile contained fixes. A blocked or unsuitable site is re-scoped before sale. Unexpected blockers receive notice, an agreed equivalent scope or reconciliation of unearned work.
Discuss an Audit & Fix SprintReview the site. Agree the fixes. Check the result.
- Confirm what the site uses, what it needs to do and which accounts we can access. Check all 22 areas and record the findings.
- Choose up to two small fixes and agree what each will change and how we will check it.
- Make the changes in supported parts of the site, take one combined round of feedback and check the result. You receive before-and-after notes and an ordered list of remaining work.
A contained fix has an agreed affected area, intended outcome and completion check using known components. Examples: clarify an existing service section and its CTA, correct an internal-link path, or repair a small navigation defect.
Not included
This is not a promise to fix every finding. New workflow builds, application architecture, complex data/security audits, new systems/templates, custom integrations, extensive migrations, original field research and specialist certification are separate.
No ranking, revenue, legal-compliance or accessibility-certification guarantee. A website baseline is not a specialist security audit of an application.
An existing website
Choose by the job
you need finished.
“I want ongoing care.”
The $399 Website Baseline establishes access, checks the site and orders the work. A first safe fix is included where appropriate, outside the first month’s allowance.
“I need a review and repairs.”
The $750 Audit & Fix Sprint includes the baseline and up to two agreed small fixes. It can stand alone, with no monthly subscription.
“I know one thing is broken.”
Describe the symptom first: for example, which form or link fails and what should happen. We confirm whether a contained fix is feasible before recommending a Sprint, a separate scope or a specialist.
One usable baseline, one charge. A usable studio build or Sprint already covers the setup review. We check the existing work before quoting; choosing a Sprint does not add another $399 setup charge.
What the website review delivers
Clear findings.
Useful next steps.
We inspect 22 areas of the agreed website: how it explains the business, how people use it, what its technical checks show, and who owns and maintains it.
- An evidence record: what was checked, the affected page or task, the finding and its practical consequence.
- Honest access status: checked, needs access, unverified or not applicable. Missing access is never reported as passed.
- A prioritized backlog: useful corrections, dependencies and recommended next steps.
- For included fixes: agreed completion checks, before/after notes, retests and handoff. A review does not include unlimited repairs.
See all 22 review areas and what we check
- Buyer relevance and positioning
Can the intended customer tell who the business serves and what it helps them do?
- Distinctive studio identity
Do the visual choices give the business a coherent, recognizable presence?
- Hero composition and motion purpose
Does the opening explain the offer, with useful motion and a complete still fallback?
- Typography and hierarchy
Are headings, body text and labels readable and clearly organized?
- Layout rhythm and information density
Is information paced so a visitor can scan, compare and find the next step?
- Art direction and explanatory visuals
Do images and diagrams explain the work without misleading claims?
- Project evidence and buyer confidence
Can visitors inspect relevant examples, with concept work and real evidence clearly labeled?
- Named accountability and studio trust
Are the responsible person, business and contact routes clear and supported by facts?
- Package fit and scope separation
Can a buyer distinguish the services, their fit and their limits?
- Price and total-cost clarity
Are studio fees, recurring bills and optional work explained before commitment?
- Competitive price-to-value case
Can a buyer understand what the stated price buys and compare like-for-like scope?
- Care and Search usefulness
Are maintenance and improvement tasks useful, finite and distinct from already-paid work?
- Buyer-facing copy and precision
Is the writing clear, accurate and specific to the customer’s questions?
- Information architecture and navigation
Can a visitor move between related information without getting lost?
- Inquiry path and next-step confidence
Does the inquiry or booking path explain the next step and handle errors clearly?
- Mobile composition and readability
Do the important tasks and content work on narrow screens and with enlarged text?
- Accessibility foundations
Are keyboard use, focus, labels, contrast and motion preferences considered?
- Performance and loading resilience
Do loading behavior and fallbacks support the main tasks? Lab evidence and field evidence are kept separate.
- Search and semantic foundations
Do page purpose, metadata, internal links and crawl/indexing settings agree?
- Guides and editorial authority
Is helpful published guidance accurate, maintained and linked to relevant services?
- Cross-page promise and visual consistency
Do promises, prices, labels and visual patterns agree across the site?
- Ownership and post-launch confidence
Are paid work, accounts, licenses, correction boundaries and handoff responsibilities clear?
Form storage, notification delivery, Search Console, provider settings and recovery need the relevant authorized access. We identify the checks we could not perform. A website review is not legal advice, penetration testing, exhaustive accessibility certification or a guarantee of search or business results.
An inspectable example
Finding → fix → retest.
Owned studio website, October 15, 2026: the Search page listed exclusions without an explicit exclusion heading. The contained correction placed “Not included” immediately before the list. A local rendered-content check verifies that relationship. A second correction preserved canonical service choices through validation and native retry.
Inspect the two-fix packet and its dated check record. These checks establish implementation; they do not establish production inbox delivery, client acceptance or search gains.
Public-page review can inspect copy, links and many phone/keyboard tasks. Form storage, delivery logs, Search Console and restore operations require the appropriate authorized access. Missing access is recorded; an automated pass is not human accessibility certification.
Use the website audit checklist and download the test sheet
Before choosing the project size, compare keeping, fixing, reworking and rebuilding the site.
Fit first.
Then clear payment and acceptance.
Before any payment, confirm supported technology, inventory, access, useful contained work, actual provider costs and delivery dates. If the site is unsuitable, no financial commitment is requested.
Sprint: $375 after fit confirmation, before work; $375 after written completion acceptance. Baseline: $399 after confirmed fit, before work.
Completion is reviewed against the agreed inventory, evidence, fixes and handoff checklist. Send written acceptance or one consolidated list of in-scope issues; silence is not acceptance. One consolidated refinement and QA are included. Defects caused by our work against accepted scope are corrected for 30 calendar days after written completion acceptance, without using a new paid allowance.
Blocked work, cancellation and ownership
Before payment, itemize the fixed deliverables and the value allocated to each milestone. If cancelled or blocked, reconcile completed accepted work and approved unavoidable third-party commitments against payments; refund unearned amounts. Do not invent a retrospective hourly cap or fee. A new scope needs written agreement before more work.
Client retains accounts and existing assets. Paid bespoke work, the review/backlog, approved changes and operating/export notes are handed over; existing paid files are provided within five business days of completion or reconciled termination. Provider licenses and export limits are disclosed.
Inspect an actual owned audit and two completed fixes · Read the Sprint or baseline decision pack
A baseline you can keep using.
The usable Sprint baseline can start a monthly plan without another $399 baseline charge. No Sprint is required after a new build with a usable baseline.
The $399 existing-site setup for a monthly plan covers access/inventory, the same full baseline, backlog and a first contained safe fix where appropriate, outside the first month’s allowance. If no safe useful setup fix is appropriate, the baseline records that finding explicitly; it does not invent a fix. The Sprint instead includes up to two agreed fixes and its own finish.
Compare optional monthly plans · Read a useful work receipt · Payment, ownership and exit terms
After launch
Give recurring checks a clear owner.
Plan the important site, form, content and recovery checks and keep a dated record of what passed, failed or remains unverified.